Adah was someone who was different than the rest and stood out. She was looked at in the most disapproving ways by strangers and even her own family. She was already in exile before her and her family reached the Congo to try to "save" the native race. The Congolese people were portrayed as inadequate and "primitive" for their lack of curiosity. Rather this lack of curiosity was the ability to decipher between what an individual can and can't control. The Congolese couldn't control the Price family trying to change their ways but they could control the environment they offered. The Congolese people looked at Adah as if she was one of the village. She was just like everyone else and yet she still was in "exile". Her home in America was the barrier between her finding the Congo and realizes who she wanted to be. She found herself slowly slipping away from the familial ties and increasingly submerged into the foreign homeland. When an individual detaches from one comfort, they attach to a new one to fill the void. As a result, Adah Price, for once in her life, had the oppurtinuty to fit in fill her void. She, as well as the other villagers, was not afraid to stand out and be different. Through this connection, Adah began to stray from her family and her home as she grew closer to the natives still struggled letting go and finding a new identity, although she had a new home from the very exile that was expected to strip her of one.
In contrast, Adah began to question her existence and why she hadn't died as an infant. She saw the cultural rifts between her and the natives. They let twins die while her culture kept and cherished them. She was imperfect in a perfect world and that was overwhelming. She always believed she was the child that was forgotten and to justify her thoughts, she was chosen second by her own mother. Love provokes movement and passion but with Adah she had none and was utterly alone. When an individual seeks the attention to stand out and receives no accommodation, they lose their meaning of life as Adah did. She was losing her trust in those who were closest to her and she had no where to go but within. The Congo not only gave Adah her humanity, but stripped her of her conscience mind.
The Congo is an unforgiving place. One mistake and the walls come crashing down and there is nothing an individual can do about it. Adah Price learned that she was alone in this world and no one could accompany her on her journey of self realization. The idea of what she had going into the Congo was different than what she came out with. The Price family believed they were helping others and in return would have self gratitude and praise. Paradoxically, the people they were helping actually helped them come to conclusions of who they were really meant to be as individuals. Adah and her family got lost in the chaos of the unknown exile and had no idea how to get out. on the fateful day that they stepped off of the plane into a wild ritual of an unknown culture. Adah believed she could leave the Congo and go back to the way life was, but she fell through the cracks and into another world. but change is the only constant and after her world crashed with the death of Ruth May, there was nothing she could do but change the way she perceived life. There is always a price when it comes to change and once an individual gains one thing, they lose another as seen with Adah's new found self confidence, but loss of essential both her language and limp which had been apart parts of that demonstrated who she was.
Questions:
-I might have summarized too much in the first paragraph?
-Is there not enough textual evidence from the book to support my ideas?
-Did I stray too far from the topic questions or did I not even answer them? (I didn't want to directly quote the prompt in my thesis, or should of I?
-Is my thesis clear?
You did over summarize but not overbearingly so. The "hook" sentence is a bit cheesy which is typical when using a question as a hook (a hook needs to have a more thought provoking feel). The writing and grammar is great with just some minor mistakes. The thesis is a make-or break in an essay; you're thesis is great with a combination of great analysis and summary.
ReplyDeleteAnswers:
ReplyDelete-I don't think you summarized to much in the first paragraph, more that you didn't connect your summary with your thesis enough. In your second or third paragraph you may have summarized a bit too much.
-I think there is plenty textual evidence in your essay, what i think may lack is your explanations and your expanding on this evidence.
-The balance between regurgitating the prompt and restating the prompt too creatively is a delicate one, however i think you did a good job- it was creatively said without losing the reader.
-The thesis.I think it could have been clearer. The only point in which i think you strayed from it was when you dabbled in the ideas of control- I didnt quite understand how it related to exile.
*Overall I think this was a solid essay. You demonstrated a great comprehension of the book, exercised your vocabulary, and I really enjoyed your opening questioning. It was good food for thought especially when it comes to this book. It immediately made me think of Racheal Price who did not want to assimilate to Congo life in the beginning. I think playing with your question throughout your essay would have made it stronger.
I don't believe that you summarized too much in the introduction paragraph. I don't think that you summarized too much at all throughout the entire essay. As far as the introduction paragraph goes I think it could have been a lot stronger, like your concluding paragraph which to me seemed very strong.
ReplyDeleteI believe you did an excellent job at using examples from the book and forming ideas from them. Could you have expanded those ideas a little more? Sure. But overall you created excellent ideas and represented them very well.
As for including the prompt I don't believe that is was truly necessary, but as far as your thesis I thought that it was very strong. You resembled your ideas presented in the thesis very well throughout the paper.
Throughout the essay you used great vocabulary and incorporated long and complex sentences, which helped the paper flow.
Your textual evidences were great choices but just needed a little more elaboration to make the deeper connection. Relating your examples to your thesis would also be a good idea. Your varied sentence structures were awesome and vocab usage was great. Well done my friend!
ReplyDeleteThank you all for your inputs! I really appreciate them and it will help me fix my problems in the long run so thank you for all your honest opinions:)
ReplyDeleteI feel like you talked about the change the entire family experienced in the Congo more than anything. It tied in well with your thesis, but I feel like you should have added more specific examples that brought her enrichment and alienation instead, although you already had plenty of examples. Your conclusion paragraph was really strong in weaving everything cohesively and I liked your view on how the Congo changed the Price family when they went into the situation believing the exact opposite would occur. It was a great essay, as usual! Keep up the work Hurd!
ReplyDelete